Fathom vs Notta

Both scored against the same 13 criteria, from the same hands-on testing. Here is where each one actually wins.

Last updated October 2026 · 28 tools ranked

Fathom rates higher overall, 3.7 out of 5 against Notta's 3.3, across our 13 weighted criteria. Fathom leads on knowledge connection, transcription accuracy, recording consent & compliance. Notta still wins on offline capability.

Fathom

#9 of 28

Free AI meeting assistant with instant summaries

3.7
Pricing
Free tier available; paid from $16/mo
Platforms
Web, macOS, Windows
Read the full Fathom review →

Notta

#25 of 28

AI meeting assistant with multilingual transcription

3.3
Pricing
Free tier available; paid from $8.17/mo
Platforms
Web, iOS, Android, Chrome extension, macOS, Windows
Read the full Notta review →

All 13 Criteria, Side by Side

Criterion Weight Fathom Notta Winner
Privacy & Data Security High 3 3 Tie
Transcription Accuracy High 5 4 Fathom
AI Analysis Quality High 4 4 Tie
Recording Consent & Compliance Med 4 3 Fathom
Data Retention & Training Transparency Med 2 2 Tie
Real-Time / Live Capability Med 3 3 Tie
Recording Method Med 4 3 Fathom
Ease of Use Med 5 4 Fathom
Platform Support Med 4 4 Tie
Offline Capability Med 1 2 Notta
Integration Ecosystem Med 5 4 Fathom
Knowledge Connection Low 5 3 Fathom
Pricing & Value Low 4 3 Fathom
Overall (weighted) 3.7 3.3 Fathom

Overall is a weighted average, not a mean: high-weight criteria count triple and low-weight criteria count once. See the formula.

Choose Fathom if…

  • → Knowledge Connection matters to you. Fathom scores 5/5 here against 3/5.

The best free option for individuals who want simple, no-fuss meeting notes, now backed by a transparent paid ladder and a real-time desktop app.

Choose Notta if…

  • → Offline Capability matters to you. Notta scores 2/5 here against 1/5.

A capable multilingual cloud transcriber that has grown its platform and integration story, but real-time translation now costs extra and only transcription, in a few languages, can run on-device.

Fathom at a glance

Strengths

  • +Genuinely generous free tier
  • +Very easy to use
  • +Clean summaries
  • +Bot-free capture and real-time summaries

Limitations

  • −Cloud processing required
  • −Only a limited number of advanced AI summaries on the free plan
  • −Trains its own AI models on de-identified customer data by default (opt-out available)
  • −No mobile app yet (iOS announced, not shipped)

Notta at a glance

Strengths

  • +Broad language coverage (58 for transcription)
  • +Native iOS, Android, and now Mac/Windows desktop apps
  • +Bot-free capture via Notta Desktop, with optional offline on-device transcription (beta)
  • +Expanded integration set (Salesforce, Slack, Notion, HubSpot, more)

Limitations

  • −AI notes and most features are cloud-only; on-device mode covers transcription in a few languages
  • −Real-time translation is now a paid add-on, not bundled
  • −Restrictive free tier (3-minute cap per recording)
  • −Reports of auto-renewal charges after cancellation attempts

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Fathom or Notta better? +
Fathom scores higher overall — 3.7 out of 5 against Notta's 3.3 — on our 13-criteria weighted scoring. That is a 0.4-point gap, so it is a real but not overwhelming difference. Fathom is the better default choice; Notta is the better choice if you specifically need offline capability.
How much do Fathom and Notta cost? +
Fathom: Free tier available; paid from $16/mo. Notta: Free tier available; paid from $8.17/mo. On our pricing and value criterion, which weighs cost against what you get for it, Fathom scores 4/5 and Notta scores 3/5.
Which platforms do Fathom and Notta support? +
Fathom runs on Web, macOS, Windows. Notta runs on Web, iOS, Android, Chrome extension, macOS, Windows. They score the same on platform support.
Which is better for privacy, Fathom or Notta? +
On privacy and data security Fathom scores 3/5 and Notta scores 3/5. Two related criteria matter as much: recording consent and compliance (Fathom 4/5, Notta 3/5) and data retention and training transparency (Fathom 2/5, Notta 2/5). Tools that train on customer data by default or record without clear all-party consent score low on those two regardless of their encryption claims.