Head to Head

Microsoft Teams Copilot vs Notta

Both scored against the same 13 criteria, from the same hands-on testing. Here is where each one actually wins.

Last updated October 2026 · 28 tools ranked

Microsoft Teams Copilot rates higher overall, 3.9 out of 5 against Notta's 3.3, across our 13 weighted criteria. Microsoft Teams Copilot leads on data retention & training transparency, real-time / live capability, knowledge connection. Notta still wins on offline capability.

Microsoft Teams Copilot

#3 of 28

Microsoft's native, agentic meeting AI built into Teams for the Microsoft 365 stack

3.9
Pricing
No free tier; from $21/user/mo (annual)
Platforms
Web, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android
Read the full Microsoft Teams Copilot review →

Notta

#25 of 28

AI meeting assistant with multilingual transcription

3.3
Pricing
Free tier available; paid from $8.17/mo
Platforms
Web, iOS, Android, Chrome extension, macOS, Windows
Read the full Notta review →

All 13 Criteria, Side by Side

Criterion Weight Microsoft Teams Copilot Notta Winner
Privacy & Data Security High 3 3 Tie
Transcription Accuracy High 4 4 Tie
AI Analysis Quality High 4 4 Tie
Recording Consent & Compliance Med 4 3 Microsoft Teams Copilot
Data Retention & Training Transparency Med 4 2 Microsoft Teams Copilot
Real-Time / Live Capability Med 5 3 Microsoft Teams Copilot
Recording Method Med 4 3 Microsoft Teams Copilot
Ease of Use Med 5 4 Microsoft Teams Copilot
Platform Support Med 5 4 Microsoft Teams Copilot
Offline Capability Med 1 2 Notta
Integration Ecosystem Med 4 4 Tie
Knowledge Connection Low 5 3 Microsoft Teams Copilot
Pricing & Value Low 3 3 Tie
Overall (weighted) 3.9 3.3 Microsoft Teams Copilot

Overall is a weighted average, not a mean: high-weight criteria count triple and low-weight criteria count once. See the formula.

Choose Microsoft Teams Copilot if…

  • → Data Retention & Training Transparency matters to you. Microsoft Teams Copilot scores 4/5 here against 2/5.
  • → Real-Time / Live Capability matters to you. Microsoft Teams Copilot scores 5/5 here against 3/5.
  • → Knowledge Connection matters to you. Microsoft Teams Copilot scores 5/5 here against 3/5.

A genuinely strong, agentic meeting assistant for Microsoft 365 shops, but it is cloud-only, locked to Teams meetings, and the real meeting AI sits behind a paid Copilot license from $21/user.

Choose Notta if…

  • → Offline Capability matters to you. Notta scores 2/5 here against 1/5.

A capable multilingual cloud transcriber that has grown its platform and integration story, but real-time translation now costs extra and only transcription, in a few languages, can run on-device.

Microsoft Teams Copilot at a glance

Strengths

  • +Native to Teams, no external bot joins the meeting
  • +Strong agentic features via the Facilitator agent: live AI notes, agenda tracking, and auto task sync to Planner
  • +Deepest integration with Microsoft 365 (Outlook, Word, Planner, SharePoint, grounded in Microsoft Graph)
  • +Enterprise-grade compliance: SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA with BAA, and no foundation-model training on your data

Limitations

  • −Cloud-only with no offline mode
  • −Works only inside Microsoft Teams meetings; in-person capture needs a Teams Rooms setup
  • −The full meeting Copilot needs a paid Copilot license: $21/user/month for Copilot Business (up to 300 users) or $30 for enterprise
  • −Limited native reach into non-Microsoft CRMs and task tools

Notta at a glance

Strengths

  • +Broad language coverage (58 for transcription)
  • +Native iOS, Android, and now Mac/Windows desktop apps
  • +Bot-free capture via Notta Desktop, with optional offline on-device transcription (beta)
  • +Expanded integration set (Salesforce, Slack, Notion, HubSpot, more)

Limitations

  • −AI notes and most features are cloud-only; on-device mode covers transcription in a few languages
  • −Real-time translation is now a paid add-on, not bundled
  • −Restrictive free tier (3-minute cap per recording)
  • −Reports of auto-renewal charges after cancellation attempts

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Microsoft Teams Copilot or Notta better? +
Microsoft Teams Copilot scores higher overall — 3.9 out of 5 against Notta's 3.3 — on our 13-criteria weighted scoring. That is a 0.6-point gap, so it is a real but not overwhelming difference. Microsoft Teams Copilot is the better default choice; Notta is the better choice if you specifically need offline capability.
How much do Microsoft Teams Copilot and Notta cost? +
Microsoft Teams Copilot: No free tier; from $21/user/mo (annual). Notta: Free tier available; paid from $8.17/mo. On our pricing and value criterion, which weighs cost against what you get for it, Microsoft Teams Copilot scores 3/5 and Notta scores 3/5.
Which platforms do Microsoft Teams Copilot and Notta support? +
Microsoft Teams Copilot runs on Web, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android. Notta runs on Web, iOS, Android, Chrome extension, macOS, Windows. Microsoft Teams Copilot scores higher on platform coverage.
Which is better for privacy, Microsoft Teams Copilot or Notta? +
On privacy and data security Microsoft Teams Copilot scores 3/5 and Notta scores 3/5. Two related criteria matter as much: recording consent and compliance (Microsoft Teams Copilot 4/5, Notta 3/5) and data retention and training transparency (Microsoft Teams Copilot 4/5, Notta 2/5). Tools that train on customer data by default or record without clear all-party consent score low on those two regardless of their encryption claims.
All comparisons → Microsoft Teams Copilot alternatives → Notta alternatives → Full rankings →