AI Meeting Assistant Rankings 2026
Every product tested and rated across 10 criteria. Click any row for the full review.
| # | Product | Privacy | Transcription | AI Analysis | Recording | Ease of Use | Platforms | Offline | Integrations | Knowledge | Value | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hedy Pick | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4.7 |
| 2 | Otter.ai | 3 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4.3 |
| 3 | Fireflies.ai | 3 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4.2 |
| 4 | Fathom | 3 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4.1 |
| 5 | Granola | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4.0 |
| 6 | Read.ai | 3 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 3.9 |
| 7 | tl;dv | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3.8 |
| 8 | Krisp | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3.7 |
| 9 | Notta | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3.6 |
| 10 | Tactiq | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3.5 |
| 11 | Fellow | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3.5 |
| 12 | Grain | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3.4 |
| 13 | Avoma | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3.4 |
| 14 | Sembly.ai | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3.3 |
| 15 | MeetGeek | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3.2 |
| 16 | Zoom AI Companion | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3.2 |
| 17 | TwinMind | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3.1 |
| 18 | Plaud.ai | 4 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3.0 |
| 19 | MacWhisper | 5 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2.9 |
| 20 | Outdoo | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2.5 |
The most privacy-focused AI meeting assistant with unmatched on-device processing and real-time coaching.
A solid cloud-based option for teams who prioritize collaboration features over privacy.
Best for sales teams who need deep CRM integration and conversation analytics.
The best free option for individuals who want simple, no-fuss meeting notes.
An excellent Mac-native option that blends manual note-taking with AI, but limited by platform support.
Best for managers who want meeting analytics and engagement insights beyond just notes.
A solid choice for teams who value shareable meeting clips and CRM integration.
Best for users in noisy environments who need noise cancellation alongside basic transcription.
Best for multilingual teams who need transcription and translation across languages.
A lightweight, affordable option for individuals who primarily use Google Meet or Zoom in Chrome.
Best for teams who want structured meeting management with agendas and follow-ups, not just AI notes.
Best for product and UX teams who need to share meeting highlights and customer insights.
A powerful revenue intelligence tool for sales organizations, but too complex and expensive for general use.
A decent mid-range option with good action item tracking, but doesn't stand out in any particular area.
A straightforward meeting recorder with good analytics, suited for small teams on a budget.
Convenient if you live in Zoom, but too limited for teams using multiple meeting platforms.
An interesting newcomer with a knowledge-graph approach, but limited by Apple-only support and early-stage features.
A unique hardware approach that's great for in-person meetings, but limited software features compared to pure AI solutions.
A great transcription tool for Mac users who value privacy, but lacks the AI analysis features of a true meeting assistant.
A basic meeting assistant that's easy to use but lacks the depth and polish of more established competitors.
Our Methodology
Each product is tested across real meetings and rated on 10 criteria using a 1–5 scale. Privacy, transcription, and AI analysis carry higher weight as they represent core value. The overall score reflects real-world importance, not a simple average. Read our full methodology →